By reading Benjamin alongside Proust, this essay argues that the loss of the aura has been of aesthetic detriment. Despite Benjamin’s exhortation, the political potential left in the aura’s absence has gone unrealised. The wonder of auratic experience that Proust describes is lost without a worthwhile replacement, and our relationship to art is less than it could be.

Nietzsche’s aesthetic philosophy in The Birth of Tragedy—though timelessly incisive—is restricted by the passionate and romantic inclinations evident in his early works. This paper reconstructs the origin, function and demise of Nietzschean tragic culture under the hegemony of Socratism, before revealing self-imposed limitations within his metaphysics of art, and adjusting his call for a renewal of tragic culture to be applied to the ostensibly endless world of multimodal expression we exist within today.

In this essay, I explore Plato’s critique of art as mere imitation from The Republic. I explicate Plato’s argument, before turning to a defence of the arts by critiquing Plato’s conception of art as mimesis through Parmigianino’s painting ‘Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror,’ and Josh Ashbery’s poem of the same name. The essay combines a traditional philosophical essay with a more abstract form of critique, drawing on visual art and poetic analysis to argue against Plato’s metaphysical claims about the truthfulness of art.